(1.) hazrat sharif radi (compiler of nahjul balagha) says: fatimi imam hakim bi amrillah a.s. side is shining moon and his (ithna asheri & abbasi caliphate) side is full of darkness
Hazrat Sharif Radi sahib (the compiler of Nahjul Balagha) associating his personal self with Ameer al Mumineen Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s. wrote following text -
Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem
[1.] I'm (Sharif Radi) suffering spiritual pain in the land of Abbasi caliphs, while Egypt is in caliphate of Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s. son's of Mola Ali a.s. ibn Abi Talib a.s.
[2.] Imam Hakim a.s. and my (Sharif Radi) father is same i.e. Mola Ali a.s. and likewise our Lord is same i.e. Allah.
[3.] Sunni Abbasi caliphate is strange for me. But my veins are joined with Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s., by the Lord of all people, Muhammad s.a.w.w and Ali a.s.
[4.] I (Sharif Radi) as an Ithna Asheri is like going in the darkness ('gumrahi'), while the side of Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s. shines like the bright moon.
Source of above:
Sharif Radi was employed by Sunni Abbasi Caliph as official record keeper of Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. progeny. He is stating categorically that he like Fatimi Imams a.s. are sons of Mola Ali a.s. - this negates the Ithna Asheri's false acquisition of Fatimi Imams are not in progeny of Mola Ali a.s.
He was residing in Abbasi Caliph territory who were sworn enemy of Fatimi Imams. So Sharif Radi sahib has no threat nor any pressure to write anything in favor of Fatimi Imams. He wrote above text by his freewill.
Tyrant Abbasi Caliphs forced Hazrat Sharif Radi to sign the Baghdad Manifesto. Those tyrant paid Sunni and Ithna Asheri name sake scholars all signed a manifesto that Fatimi Imams are not sons of Mola Ali a.s. The text above by Hazrat Sharif Radi makes that untrue claims in manifesto as null and void.
Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem
[1.] I'm (Sharif Radi) suffering spiritual pain in the land of Abbasi caliphs, while Egypt is in caliphate of Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s. son's of Mola Ali a.s. ibn Abi Talib a.s.
[2.] Imam Hakim a.s. and my (Sharif Radi) father is same i.e. Mola Ali a.s. and likewise our Lord is same i.e. Allah.
[3.] Sunni Abbasi caliphate is strange for me. But my veins are joined with Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s., by the Lord of all people, Muhammad s.a.w.w and Ali a.s.
[4.] I (Sharif Radi) as an Ithna Asheri is like going in the darkness ('gumrahi'), while the side of Imam Hakim bi Amrillah a.s. shines like the bright moon.
Source of above:
- Ibnul Athir al Kamil, Diwan 546, viii, 24, 25
- Kitab Ikhtilaf Usulil Madhahib of Qadi Numan B. Muhammad by S.T. Lokhandwalla, Year 1972 under 'Indian Institute of Advanced Study', Shimla.
- Ibn Tiqtaqa also quoted the above poem in his al-Fakhri (comp. 699/1302).
- Abul Fida (1273-1331) and
- Makrizi (1363-1442)
Sharif Radi was employed by Sunni Abbasi Caliph as official record keeper of Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. progeny. He is stating categorically that he like Fatimi Imams a.s. are sons of Mola Ali a.s. - this negates the Ithna Asheri's false acquisition of Fatimi Imams are not in progeny of Mola Ali a.s.
He was residing in Abbasi Caliph territory who were sworn enemy of Fatimi Imams. So Sharif Radi sahib has no threat nor any pressure to write anything in favor of Fatimi Imams. He wrote above text by his freewill.
Tyrant Abbasi Caliphs forced Hazrat Sharif Radi to sign the Baghdad Manifesto. Those tyrant paid Sunni and Ithna Asheri name sake scholars all signed a manifesto that Fatimi Imams are not sons of Mola Ali a.s. The text above by Hazrat Sharif Radi makes that untrue claims in manifesto as null and void.
(2.) question) who verified if 12th alleged imam mahdi is alive?
answer) no one.
answer) no one.
Ithna Asheri claims that no one knows Imam Mahdi's whereabouts and no one have any news about him.
Analysis: Then from where they came up with the news that he is still alive?!!! So his existence is mere an imagination which is feeded in mind of commoner so the opportunist (self made religious leader Marja /Ayatollah) can make money (Khums, Zakat, etc) and can be in power.
Ithna Asheri are unable to directly answer above so so say something - they try to sight their books that in it is written that there is 12th Imam who is alive. They can write anything in their books! But does that make them reliable? No.
Please note - In none of Ithna Asheri books written before childless death of Hazrat Hasan Askari sahib there is no mention that there will be only 12 maximum Imams.
The imagination of having max 12 Imams only and the 12th one be having elongated life can be only found in their books which were written only after the childless death of Hz. Hasan Askari sahib - This imagination was feeded so the opportunist (self appointed leaders i.e. Marja/Ayatollah) can continue running a successful commercial enterprises (of profiting from collecting the religious taxes).
Analysis: Then from where they came up with the news that he is still alive?!!! So his existence is mere an imagination which is feeded in mind of commoner so the opportunist (self made religious leader Marja /Ayatollah) can make money (Khums, Zakat, etc) and can be in power.
Ithna Asheri are unable to directly answer above so so say something - they try to sight their books that in it is written that there is 12th Imam who is alive. They can write anything in their books! But does that make them reliable? No.
Please note - In none of Ithna Asheri books written before childless death of Hazrat Hasan Askari sahib there is no mention that there will be only 12 maximum Imams.
The imagination of having max 12 Imams only and the 12th one be having elongated life can be only found in their books which were written only after the childless death of Hz. Hasan Askari sahib - This imagination was feeded so the opportunist (self appointed leaders i.e. Marja/Ayatollah) can continue running a successful commercial enterprises (of profiting from collecting the religious taxes).
(3.) Game of throne by hz. musa kazim & hz. ali reza
(1.) Hz. Musa Kazim was pawn of Abbasi Caliphs, he mustered support of Iran's Ithna Asheri followers to get Abbasi Caliph crowned on throne of Baghdad, and in return Abbasi Caliph will make his son Hz. Ali Reza the heir-apparent.
Proof of above state of affairs: Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza were so enthralled by their commercial prospective that to please Abbas Caliphs Hz. Musa Kazim named his ONLY daughter after the name of "Aaisha", and ditto by Ali Reza, he too kept his daughter name as "Aaisha".
In Shia world - "Aaisha" was one who came to fight war against Mola Ali a.s. in 'Jung a Jamal', she also lead the band who fired arrows on the dead body of Imam Hasan a.s. and she throughout kept animosity with Panjatan a.s., so in Shia world, the name "Aaisha" is forbidden to be kept for Shi'a daughters and this name is most disliked by Shia. The time distance between (Musa Kazim / Ali Reza) and Aaisha bint Abu Bakr was approx. ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS, so in Shia world, by the time of these two alleged Imams there was no trend to keep name "Aaisha".
So the fact that those two alleged Imams kept their daughters name as "Aaisha", is proof that they were inclined towards material gain of becoming heir-apparent and then king, and they were least bothered about Shia-sentiments. They were more interested in promoting their personal career than promoting Shia cause.
Also it is very upsetting that Hz. Musa Kazim mustered support to make enemy (Abbasi caliph) crown the throne of Baghdad!
(2.) The time distance between martyrdom of (Mola Ali, Karbala event) and (Musa Kazim & Ali Reza) is approx. 125-150 years. The trend to keep ones children's name like Marwan, Mawiya, Yazeed, Shimar, etc died long back in the Shia world.
Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza 125-150 years after Mola Ali a.s & Imam Hussain a.s. martyrdom, to make Abbasi Caliph happy, they promoted among their Ithna Asheri followers to keep their children name like Yazeed, Shimar, Marwan, Mawiya and alike.
The proof of this is Ithna Asheri's own publicly begged hadith collection book called: Usool-e-Kafi. Check the name of the tradition narrators, those are the prominent Ithna Asheri scholars of their time, scores and scores of those names are Yazeed, Shimar, Mawiya, et al.
So the Usul-e-Kafi itself is the living proof that Imams of Ithna Asheri's are NOT Shia's ROLE-MODEL, they are pawn of Abbasi Caliphs and were materialist in practice than a practicing Shia.
(3.) In Battle of Siffin our Mola Ali a.s. used white-color flag, his enemies used black color flag. Prophet gave a green color flag to Ali and that was later used by his progeny Fatimi Caliphs, besides they used white color flag.
The Abbasi caliphs who were enemies of Shia used black color for their flag and everyday attire. Till date their followers i.e. terrorist organizations like ISIS, Boko Haram, etc their outfit till date is fully black. So Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz Ali Reza to make their political aspiration savior the Abbasi caliph happy - made their followers to ditch the color of Prophet and Mola Ali (white and green) and copy the footsteps of Mawiya (battle of Siffin) and Abbasi caliphs, so till date ignorant Ithna Asheri clad like crow, showing they are party to Mawiya in Siffin and are with Abbasi doctrine, and don't care to match their act with Prophet and Ali a.s.
(4.) Prophet & Quran are all pro-mathematics, scores of verses speaks on fix number of days of Ramadan. So those who truly followed the footsteps of Panjatan and their progeny of Fatimi Imams were blessed to have a fix 30 days system of Ramadan.
Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza followed the footsteps of Abbasi caliphs so till date their number of Ramadan days are not fixed, some year they are 29 days, other years of 30 days Ramadan, and in same year at some place 29 days and other place 30 days Ramadan. These all are non-compliance with Quran. So those two alleged Imams of Ithna Asheri took their followers away from Sirat-a-mustaqeem (command of Quran) and left them to follow the suit of Abbasi caliphs.
(5.) Why Mola Ali a.s. didn't claimed his right to caliphate after the martyrdom of Prophet s.a.? One of the reason was that 1-2-3 had hatched a scheme that if Ali claimed his right then they will start movement to get all new-Muslim to convert back to their original religion of Idol-worshipping. 1-2-3, Ummaiyyad and Abbasi caliphs they all are birds of same feather who on doctrine grounds have always flocked together.
Hz. Musa Kazim / Hz. Ali Reza and progeny too promoted the idol worshipping among their followers. They make statue of Imam Hussain and take its procession on road, they cut a metallic hand and regard it as symbol of Syyedi Abbas Alamdar a.s. severed hand - Ithna Asheri do its idol-worship by hanging flower garland on that metal hand, will burn scent-stick near it and they will kiss it as if that men-made hand can feel and bless the action of its Ithna Asheri worshipper. They keep jhoola, frocks, statue of horse, etc in their mosque/imam-bara.
Abbasi caliphs wanted to show Shia down, so to make mockery of Shia they via Hz. Musa Kazim, Hz. Ali Reza and progeny got the place of Allah's worship (mosque) turned into temple hosting idols!!!
Prophet Ibrahim a.s. made mockery of idol-worshippers, he beheaded all junior idols and made rosary of their head and hanged it over the neck of the biggest idol in temple. People inquired with him who did it? Prophet Ibrahim a.s. replied: Ask your the biggest idol on who the culprit is. Idol-worshippers replied: Neither he listen to us, nor can he reply our queries. Ibrahim a.s. said: Then why are you associating with them!!! Your act is in vain..... likewise are Ithna Asheri who make the hand shape by themselves, garland it, and kiss it, and seek blessings! But they forget the above Quranic verse about Ibrahim a.s. - those metal men-made hand neither feel nor can it bless!!!
Prophet Mohammad s.a. & Mola Ali a.s. broke the idols from the house of God (Kaaba) and Hz. Musa Kazin, Hz. Ali Reza and progeny established idols in the house of God!!!
Read the God's curse in Quran on those who started associating with the Golden Calf (statue worshipping).
Proof of above state of affairs: Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza were so enthralled by their commercial prospective that to please Abbas Caliphs Hz. Musa Kazim named his ONLY daughter after the name of "Aaisha", and ditto by Ali Reza, he too kept his daughter name as "Aaisha".
In Shia world - "Aaisha" was one who came to fight war against Mola Ali a.s. in 'Jung a Jamal', she also lead the band who fired arrows on the dead body of Imam Hasan a.s. and she throughout kept animosity with Panjatan a.s., so in Shia world, the name "Aaisha" is forbidden to be kept for Shi'a daughters and this name is most disliked by Shia. The time distance between (Musa Kazim / Ali Reza) and Aaisha bint Abu Bakr was approx. ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS, so in Shia world, by the time of these two alleged Imams there was no trend to keep name "Aaisha".
So the fact that those two alleged Imams kept their daughters name as "Aaisha", is proof that they were inclined towards material gain of becoming heir-apparent and then king, and they were least bothered about Shia-sentiments. They were more interested in promoting their personal career than promoting Shia cause.
Also it is very upsetting that Hz. Musa Kazim mustered support to make enemy (Abbasi caliph) crown the throne of Baghdad!
(2.) The time distance between martyrdom of (Mola Ali, Karbala event) and (Musa Kazim & Ali Reza) is approx. 125-150 years. The trend to keep ones children's name like Marwan, Mawiya, Yazeed, Shimar, etc died long back in the Shia world.
Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza 125-150 years after Mola Ali a.s & Imam Hussain a.s. martyrdom, to make Abbasi Caliph happy, they promoted among their Ithna Asheri followers to keep their children name like Yazeed, Shimar, Marwan, Mawiya and alike.
The proof of this is Ithna Asheri's own publicly begged hadith collection book called: Usool-e-Kafi. Check the name of the tradition narrators, those are the prominent Ithna Asheri scholars of their time, scores and scores of those names are Yazeed, Shimar, Mawiya, et al.
So the Usul-e-Kafi itself is the living proof that Imams of Ithna Asheri's are NOT Shia's ROLE-MODEL, they are pawn of Abbasi Caliphs and were materialist in practice than a practicing Shia.
(3.) In Battle of Siffin our Mola Ali a.s. used white-color flag, his enemies used black color flag. Prophet gave a green color flag to Ali and that was later used by his progeny Fatimi Caliphs, besides they used white color flag.
The Abbasi caliphs who were enemies of Shia used black color for their flag and everyday attire. Till date their followers i.e. terrorist organizations like ISIS, Boko Haram, etc their outfit till date is fully black. So Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz Ali Reza to make their political aspiration savior the Abbasi caliph happy - made their followers to ditch the color of Prophet and Mola Ali (white and green) and copy the footsteps of Mawiya (battle of Siffin) and Abbasi caliphs, so till date ignorant Ithna Asheri clad like crow, showing they are party to Mawiya in Siffin and are with Abbasi doctrine, and don't care to match their act with Prophet and Ali a.s.
(4.) Prophet & Quran are all pro-mathematics, scores of verses speaks on fix number of days of Ramadan. So those who truly followed the footsteps of Panjatan and their progeny of Fatimi Imams were blessed to have a fix 30 days system of Ramadan.
Hz. Musa Kazim and Hz. Ali Reza followed the footsteps of Abbasi caliphs so till date their number of Ramadan days are not fixed, some year they are 29 days, other years of 30 days Ramadan, and in same year at some place 29 days and other place 30 days Ramadan. These all are non-compliance with Quran. So those two alleged Imams of Ithna Asheri took their followers away from Sirat-a-mustaqeem (command of Quran) and left them to follow the suit of Abbasi caliphs.
(5.) Why Mola Ali a.s. didn't claimed his right to caliphate after the martyrdom of Prophet s.a.? One of the reason was that 1-2-3 had hatched a scheme that if Ali claimed his right then they will start movement to get all new-Muslim to convert back to their original religion of Idol-worshipping. 1-2-3, Ummaiyyad and Abbasi caliphs they all are birds of same feather who on doctrine grounds have always flocked together.
Hz. Musa Kazim / Hz. Ali Reza and progeny too promoted the idol worshipping among their followers. They make statue of Imam Hussain and take its procession on road, they cut a metallic hand and regard it as symbol of Syyedi Abbas Alamdar a.s. severed hand - Ithna Asheri do its idol-worship by hanging flower garland on that metal hand, will burn scent-stick near it and they will kiss it as if that men-made hand can feel and bless the action of its Ithna Asheri worshipper. They keep jhoola, frocks, statue of horse, etc in their mosque/imam-bara.
Abbasi caliphs wanted to show Shia down, so to make mockery of Shia they via Hz. Musa Kazim, Hz. Ali Reza and progeny got the place of Allah's worship (mosque) turned into temple hosting idols!!!
Prophet Ibrahim a.s. made mockery of idol-worshippers, he beheaded all junior idols and made rosary of their head and hanged it over the neck of the biggest idol in temple. People inquired with him who did it? Prophet Ibrahim a.s. replied: Ask your the biggest idol on who the culprit is. Idol-worshippers replied: Neither he listen to us, nor can he reply our queries. Ibrahim a.s. said: Then why are you associating with them!!! Your act is in vain..... likewise are Ithna Asheri who make the hand shape by themselves, garland it, and kiss it, and seek blessings! But they forget the above Quranic verse about Ibrahim a.s. - those metal men-made hand neither feel nor can it bless!!!
Prophet Mohammad s.a. & Mola Ali a.s. broke the idols from the house of God (Kaaba) and Hz. Musa Kazin, Hz. Ali Reza and progeny established idols in the house of God!!!
Read the God's curse in Quran on those who started associating with the Golden Calf (statue worshipping).
(4.) morale actions of imams successor speaks louder & clearer than everything
Fatimi Dawat: 23 Dai's of Yemen and 23 Dai's of Hindustan were appointed by the Imam of their time on the criterion of merits. In high majority instance (at least with 36 Dai's) no inheritance was made by the son of Dai, or 36 out of 46 Dai's son have not inherited their father. Few Dai's were king and have able sons still those son still didn't become next Dai cum king because there was someone who was more meritorious than the son of Dai/king. This action of inheritance is the proof that Fatimi Imam a.s. exists and Dai's are accountable to them. Syyedna Hatim (3rd Dai) was though king still use to labor and earn his bread. Molae Raj use to make soap and earn his bread, et al.
Ithna Asheri: Successor (Maraja and Ayatullah) are all self appointed and not appointed by their Imam. In the whole history (past approx. 1000 years) none of the Maraja / Ayatullah ever declared their audited income and expenditure details nor their financial status. They do not earn their bread by their own sweat. Their hoarded funds are inherited by their sons/wards as if their Maraja father has made a business income to be inherited by his sons/family.
Twelver scholars (Maraji & Ayatullah) transgressed gradually in acquiring for themselves the powers and responsibilities of the Hidden Imam. This is the result of greed for power and wealth of Usuli scholars over laymen.
Whims and fancies of Maraja/Ayatullah becomes religious rules for common Twelver. Commoner don't realise that the reasoning is open to errors from imperfect scholars in the absence of an infallible Imam.
The twelfth Imam never existed, but was a myth designed to keep the Twelver cause alive. According to Robert Gleave, the occultation of the 12th Imam "became subsequent orthodox doctrine" after none of the competing theories that sought to explain the succession to a childless 11th Imam "seemed satisfactory".
Ithna Asheri: Successor (Maraja and Ayatullah) are all self appointed and not appointed by their Imam. In the whole history (past approx. 1000 years) none of the Maraja / Ayatullah ever declared their audited income and expenditure details nor their financial status. They do not earn their bread by their own sweat. Their hoarded funds are inherited by their sons/wards as if their Maraja father has made a business income to be inherited by his sons/family.
Twelver scholars (Maraji & Ayatullah) transgressed gradually in acquiring for themselves the powers and responsibilities of the Hidden Imam. This is the result of greed for power and wealth of Usuli scholars over laymen.
Whims and fancies of Maraja/Ayatullah becomes religious rules for common Twelver. Commoner don't realise that the reasoning is open to errors from imperfect scholars in the absence of an infallible Imam.
The twelfth Imam never existed, but was a myth designed to keep the Twelver cause alive. According to Robert Gleave, the occultation of the 12th Imam "became subsequent orthodox doctrine" after none of the competing theories that sought to explain the succession to a childless 11th Imam "seemed satisfactory".
Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem
Topics:
Topics:
- "Nuss" the key to succession.
- No threat to life so hiding for it is irrational.
- No news of "him" being alive.
- No claim for Imamat.
- Sons of bondmaid.
- -
- Prophet Ibrahim -anti to- Imambara housing idols.
- Fatimi Imams are known by their Mothers name.
- Head of Imam Hussain a.s. resting with his progeny of Fatimi Imams.
- (i) "The twelve Rulers" Hadith, (ii) The count of twelve, (iii) The traditions of twelve caliphs.
- Parallels of Prophet Sunnat in marriage and association of it with rightful successor.
- Osool-a-Kaafi
- Self proven contrary claims by book '14 Masoomeen'
- No nuss-a-Jali on Hazrat Ali Naki sahib.
- Humanity beginning not with human parents but by Jinns and Nymphs per Ithna Asheri's!!!
- Marriage - Hz. Musa Kazim not followed sunnat of Prophet.
- 'Mutah' is adultery, the haraam. 14 conditions for rightful marriage.
- Mukhtar Saqfi.
- Queen Zubaida w/o Abbasi caliph Haroon Rasheed.
- Imam Ismail a.s. by Sheikh Ahmed Ali Raj
- Filmy thrill and Ithna Asheri speakers attracts audience, but the content of both are untrue in real-life and in Islam!
- Aga Khani Ismaili Khoja
[1] "Nuss" the key to succession
Adam a.s.did nuss over Habeel a.s., Ibrahim a.s.did nuss over Ismail a.s., Musa a.s.did nuss over Haroon a.s., Eesa a.s.did nuss over Shamoon a.s., Mohammad s.a.w.w.did nuss over Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s., Ali a.s.did nuss over Imam Hussain a.s.,...
The single key difference between Ismaili's and Ithna Asheri's is on point of "nuss" - former proves nuss by Imam Sadiq a.s. was done over Imam Ismail a.s., where else latter contends that the original nuss on Ismail a.s. was replaced by nuss over Hz. Musa Kazim sahib. So nuss is the key factor in matter of succession, he will become the Imam who is bestowed with nuss.
All Ithna Asheri books are in unison that their 11th Imam Hz. Hasan Askari sahib has not done any 'nuss' over Hz. Mohammad Mahdi. [Reference: Ayatullah Sayyed Sadrullah Sadr, book name: Al-Mahdi A.S.].
Remember: Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. was told by Allah till you do not do public nuss over Ali a.s. all your efforts till date as Prophet will go wasted. And when nuss was done, Allah sent aayat, now the religion is completed. Mola Ali a.s. did public nuss over his son Imam Hasan a.s., so did Hasan over to Hussain a.s., indeed he even did in writing (reference: in agreement between Imam Hasan a.s. and Muawiya, both agreed that after latter death the caliphate will be passed to former successor Imam Hussain a.s. ibn Mola Ali a.s., during the Moharram speeches it is always recited that Imam Hussain a.s. decared nuss over Imam Ali Zainul Abideen. So 'nuss' (the official public declaration) is the must for appointing next Imam. And Hz. Hasan Askari sahib didn't do any nuss over his son.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No nuss-a-jali done by Hz. Hasan Askari sahib -
[1] Was Al Mufid 'masoom'? No. Was his work vouched by Imam Mahdi (Imam of his time)? No. Is he subject to all human errors, bias, etc? Yes. So to rely on Al Mufid as the primary source to prove "Nuss-a-Jali" by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi is in itself a weak premise.
[2] There are two types of 'Nuss': (1) Nuss a Khafi and (2) Nuss a Jali, former is secretly said and latter is publicly declared. Example) Every time Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. declared Mola Ali a.s. as his successor before the event of Gadheer-a-Khum it was 'nuss-a-Khafi' (indicative declaration of successor)however, nuss-a-khafi is insignificant as Allah told to Mohammed s.a.w.w. that should you not declare Ali's nomination publicly (nuss-a-Jali)then all work of Prophethood will go waste. Despite Prophet s.a.w.w. declaration of secret/private 'nuss' on Ali several time before Gadheer event still Allah consider all such efforts as waste until the public declaration is not made. Further, even in work of Al Mufid there is no tradition that says about 'nuss-a-Jali' by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi.
[3] Al Mufid writings are IMPLICITLY proving the Imamate of Imam Mahdi. But there is no EXPLICIT tradition that says that Imam Hasan Askari made the 'nuss-a-Jali' over Imam Mahdi.
[4] You say, "Ishaara" (indication) is given in Osool-a-Kafi, but you see Sunni too says Prophet s.a.w.w. did "ishaara" (indicated) that Hz. Abu Bakr is the next authorised person. Does all Shia's accept such (ishaara) indications? No. So 'ishara' (indications) given in Osool-a-Kafi on Imamat is not equal to the facts of having 'nuss-a-jali' done by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi.
[5] Bakir Majlisi categorically said, that majority of traditions in 'Osool-a-Kafi' are fake/false! So traditions in reference to indications are true or false is marked with doubts.
[6] "Walayat" of Mola Ali a.s. is the single most important matter for any Shia but there is not even one chapter on Walayat in Osool-a-Kafi. So one cannot even remotely expect this book to validate the declaration of next Imam by Imam Hasan al Askari.
[7] The chain of narrators 'raawi' quoted in Osool-a-Kafi most of them have names of enemy of Shia Imams. They proudly says that unlike Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim their book of traditions Osool-a-Kafi is distinct as it quotes Shia's narrator than Sunni's. However, the Kafi was collected 200 years after the martyrdom of Imam Hussain a.s. and all the then Shia knew of the tragic event of Karbala. So any true Shia will not keep the name of their wards after the name of 1/2/3, Mawiya, Yazeed, Hurmula, Shimr, etc - but many-many of the narrator in Kafi have these names - how can they be Shia's?!!!
[8] Some regards Osool-a-Kafi is the only book on traditions to be vouched by the Imam Mahdi (a masoom) - but see the state of affairs of this book in point# 4, 5, 6 & 7 - no where does it proves the nuss-a-jali done by Imam Hasan Askri to Imam Mahdi!
[9] In event like marriage at least two male witness or four female witness are required. The matter of Imamate is much superior than matter of marriage. We assume that they have quoted the best example from Bakir Majlisi, so this best example speaks of just one witness! It may be consider as 'nuss-a-khafi' but certainly not 'nuss-a-Jali' this proves there is no tradition proving the 'nuss-a-jali' even in work of Bakir Majlisi.
[10] To conclude:There was no reliably categorical, clear and loud tradition that proves Imam Mahdi was declared next Imam by Imam Hasan Askari by means of nuss-a-jali.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[2] No threat to life so hiding for it is irrational.
They contends that their 12th Imam Mahdi is in seclusion for past 1200 years because of threat over his life.
They also claims that Imam Mahdi will be joined by Prophet Christ a.s., will kill Dajjal, will bring peace and justice everywhere, etc. So till all these events doesn't happens Imam Mahdi sahib cannot die.Hence, their original contention that he is hidden due to threat to his life is proven to be false and misleading.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[4] No claim for Imamat
None of the last five Imams of Ithna Asheri's have never ever claimed that they are rightful "Imams". Neither Hz. Hasan Askari sahib has recognized his (alleged) son to be the next Imam (no nuss done). Commoners are told one will die as non-Muslim those who didn't recognize Imam of time. See the mismatch: Hasan Askari sahib is not recognising his (alleged) son to be the next Imam of time (no nuss), but past 1200 years Ithna's are acting otherwise!
What will be the definition of "recognising" Imam? No traditions available in no books written before the demise of Hasan Askari sahib, and we doubt such info even is not written in literature after his death.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[5] Sons of bond maid
From Hazrat Musa Kazim onwards all Imams of Ithna Asheri line are sons of bond-maid (slave girls), where else all Fatimi Imams are sons of proper Muslim mother. Muslima (mother of all Fatimi Imams) cannot be bought or sold from market or from anywhere, but the bond-maids are bought / sold in marketplace to highest bidder like commodities - can such women be mother of rightful Imams, the sons of Mola Ali a.s.?!!! Never.
Book: History of Islam, by Maulana S. Ali Naqi Naqvi on page 19- Sara has asked Ibrahim to make (extramarital illicit sexual) relations with Hajar so Ibrahim can become father as Sara got too old to bear a child.
So per Ithna's theory Prophet Ismail a.s. too is son of bond maid, by the extension Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. too is the son of bond maid. If those Prophets are acceptable though being sons of bond maid then so does their Imams from Hz. Musa Kazim sahib till Hz. Hasan Askari sahib who are all sons of bond maid.
www.TheBohras.com: Above is the lie. Isaac was son of Sara. The birth of Isaac falsify everything forged above in red. They think Prophet Ibrahim a.s. is one like them to make illicit sexual relations practiced by them under cover of Muta.
The same author contradicts himself, on page 27 he writes, Bani Israil are descendent of Isaac son of Ibrahim from Sara!!!
Primarily Ithna Asheri quotes Bible old testament for their case above. It is true in Bible case above in red it mentioned, but then again the birth of Isaac from Sara proves the theory in red above as fabricated lies.
Q) Why Christians and Israelites have forged above in old testament?
A) Because both Christians and Jews are from progeny of Isaac a.s. and Prophet Mohammad PBUH is from the progeny of Hz. Ismail a.s.. As they have lost to Islam not only in all battlefields but also in 'Mubahila' so to mock Islam they have altered the text of original Bible to prove that Prophet Mohammad is actually the son from illicit illegal sexual relations!
Ithna Asheri's in their inability and failure to counter the fact that not even one but all of their Imams are the sons of bond maid, they went so far from Siraat-a-Mustaqeem that they adopted as correct the lie version of Christian and Jew Old Testament which was fabricated to mock Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w.
On page 18 & 19 of above mentioned book, author is saying, "A long period had elapsed since Ibrahim had settled in Syria. He and his wife Sara had long been married but they had no issue. Sara then earnestly advised Ibrahim to have conjugal relations with Hajra, who was already with her, so that God might bless them with children. Ibrahim acted upon her suggestion and consequently Hajra gave birth to a son, Ismail."
Hajra was not even bond maid of Ibrahim so as per Ithna's Ibrahim has raped Hajar! Making illegal relations with any women is rape. Hence Hajar is not a good women because of her the FRIEND OF ALLAH, Prophet Ibrahim a.s. has committed sin of raping women or making conjugal relations! Should this was true - then why will Allah make action of Hajar of she doing 'sahi' between Safa and Marwa hillock as the part of the pillar of Islam, Haj?!!! Hence proved, Hajar was proper Muslima, married to Ibrahim and his status was attested by Allah be making her action as part of Haj.
To justify their Imams, they have insulted and reduced the status of Prophet Ibrahim a.s. and Molatina Hajar a.s.
Ismail ibn Kathir, a highly influential Sunni scholar in his book "Qissa-a-Anbiya" writes that Haajar w/o Prophet Ibrahim (a) was daughter of some King (not the bondmaid as falsely accused by Ithna Asheri)and was marriedto Ibrahim (not having illicit relations as falsely accused by the Bible Old Testament and Ithna's).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[6]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[7] Prophet Ibrahim -anti to- Imambara housing idols
In Quran, Sura Ibrahim says: Ibrahim beheaded all smaller idols, made rosary of it and hanged it over neck of bigger idol. Worshippers on their return to temple were aghast to see the situation and accused Ibrahim for same:
Idol worshippers - Have you did that?
Ibrahim - Ask your bigger idol.
Idol worshippers - Neither he listens, nor he replies.
Ibrahim - Then you should not maintain them.
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. and Mola Ali a.s. cleared the terrace of Kaaba from all idols.
Both above case clearly establish that one should not maintain idols. But Ithna Asheri Imambada's are full of idols of horses, cradle, Imam Hussain a.s. statue, girl-frocks, aluminium/steel hands, 'taaziya' - all decorated in lights, with burning scent-sticks and flowerbeds are hanged over them!
We like to ask: When you kiss or garland the steel hand or statue of Imam Hussain a.s. or seek blessings from it - does it feel and understand your actions?!!! NO. Ask those 'Panja' or 'Shabeeh' to reply you?!!! Will they reply? NO.
Thus one is wasting his/her money by offering flowers rosary over them or by burning scent-sticks near it. Moreover, it is against the sunnat of Prophet Ibrahim a.s. as discussed above.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[8] Fatimi Imams are known by their Mothers name
Allah will call everyone by their and their mother's name on the day of judgement. None of the ruling or non-ruling religious head like Banu Abbas, Ithna Ashier Imams, Banu Umaiyya, Ottoman Empire, etc none of them are named after their mother. Only Fatimi Imam's are identified or called by their mother (Fatima) name.
The world first modern university was brain work of Fatimi Imam Syyedna Moiz a.s.was named after his mother "Al Zahra" (Al Azhar University) in Cairo.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[9] Head of Imam Hussain a.s. resting with his progeny of Fatimi Imams
Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem
History of the sacred head of 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain a.s.
Fatimi Dawat stand: Sacred head of 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s. was burried at Ashkelon and then transferred to Egypt to be burried along with Imam Hussain a.s. progeny of Fatimi Imams a.s.
All branches of Shia don't agree with above are proven incorrect by the analytical article published by a USA newspaper Los Angeles Times (USA) (article link below). Our stand is endorsed by Los Angeles Times. Subhan'Allah.
Headless body of Imam Hussain a.s. remained and burried in Karbala. His head over the spear was sent as winners trophy first in Kufa to its governor Ibn Ziyad and later to Yazeed in Damascus.
Durrenajaf says, 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain a.s. head was then burried in niche of one of the walls of Jama Masjid in Damascus for approx. two centuries. In hatred for Imam Hussain a.s. the Banu Abbasi caliph secretly transferred head to Ashkelon (Israil), 58 kilometres from Tel Aviv in year 295 A.H.
Fatimi Imam Syyedna wa molana Imam Aziz a.s. traced the site of sacred head of Imam Hussain a.s., like Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. traced burial site of Mola Ali a.s.
Fatimi Dai Syyedi Badrul Jamali r.a. in year 448 A.H. with blessings of Imam Mustansirbillah a.s. conquered Palestine and at that site constructed mosque (which Los Angeles Times is reporting in its article).
Sunni historian Ibn Khalikan and traveller Ibn Batuta admitted the authenticity of the burial place of Raas al Hussain in Ashkelon.
Historians - (1) Maqrezi, (2) Al Qalaq'Shandi and (3) Ibn Muyassar (for their book names and page number refer to Durrenajaf article in this context) reports - on 2nd September 1153 A.D. the head of Imam Hussain a.s. was burried along with his sons graves of Fatimi Imams a.s.
At present and since past approx. one thousand years the sacred head of Imam Hussain a.s. is resting along with his sons, the Fatimi Imams a.s. in Cairo.
Salwaat.
Link to Los Angeles Times: articles.latimes.com/2008/may/21/world/fg-mosque21
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[10] "The twelve rulers" hadith
Oxford dictionary: Caliph = The chief Muslim civil and religious RULER, regarded as the successor of Mohammad (s).
The only twelve rulers in single chain that Earth has seen from the tribe of Quraysh are:
1. Mola Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s.
2. Imam Hasan ibn Ali (a)
3. Imam Abdullah Mehdi (a)
4. Imam Mohammad Quaim (a)
5. Imam Mansoor (a)
6. Imam Moiz (a)
7. Imam Aziz (a)
8. Imam Hakim (a)
9. Imam Zahir (a)
10. Imam Mustansirbillah (a)
11. Imam Mustali (a)
12. Imam Aamir (a)
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
At least 9 out of 12 Ithna Asheri Imams have never ever ruled any territories!!!
# Umayyad rulers were: 33.
# Abbasi rulers were: 54.
# Al Mohad rulers: 13.
# Ottoman caliphs (ruler): 29.
# Zaydi Imams (caliphs): 5.
In history only the chain of Fatimi Imams have the precise count of 12 rulers / emirs / caliphs.
Bihar al-Anwar, the most reputed book of Ithna Asheri's (vol. 36, chap. 41, tradition 102) says: Prophet said Islam will survive till the Qayamat AND there are 12 caliphs RULING upon you.
Twelvers own book says the 12 Imams have to be 12 rulers. But at least 9 of 12 Ithna Imams were NOT rulers. Hence, by Ithna's own standard their line of Imamat is not Islamic but of imposters. Isn't it?
This hadith is also reported by Sunni's 'Musnad Ahmad' vol. 5, pg. 89.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sahih Bukhari 89 : 329 - Prophet said, there will be 12 Muslim rulers who will lead the Islamic world.
None of the Ithna Asheri Imam never ever ruled any territory. Only 12 Fatimi Imams ruled large territories.
Sahih Muslim 20 : 4480 & 82 - Islam will triumph, remain powerful and dominant until 12 caliphs.
Only Fatimi Imams have ruled completely over Vatican / Italy, Israil and even kicked out Abbasi caliph from their capital city of Baghdad.
Where else Ithna Asheri Imams with their version of Islam never triumphed and never ever dominated anything!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sunni's Ahmad ibn Hanbal vol. 1, pg. 398 - How many caliph will rule this nation? Prophet replied, twelve like the chiefs of bani Israel.
9/12 Ithna Asheri Imams never ever ruled. Where else twelve caliphs of Fatimi line of Imams did rule.
The count of 12 precisely fit only with Fatimi Imams rulers.
Above facts establish the conclusion that the only rightful successor of Prophet Mohammad (s) is the Fatimi line of Imams.
The count of Twelve
Quran verse 5:55 categorically uses the word "Wali" in context of Mola Ali a.s. along with Mohammad (s) as the authority of Islam.
Mohammad (s) said, "Me and Ali are the father and mother of all Mumineen. Hasan and Hussain are the rightful Imam and their father Ali (the Wali) is superior than them." So Imam Hasan a.s. is the 1st Imam of era of Mohammad (s). And Ali a.s. is Wasi.
Allegiance to Allah's appointed Authorised person i.e. Nabi, wasi and Imam is of so paramount importance that Fatimi Dawat recognise 'Walayat' as the Pillar of Islam.
They unjustly pull-down status of Mola Ali a.s. from upper Islamic hierarchy of Walayat to lower hierarchy of Imamat to make their Imams headcount to twelve!
Please pay attention: In none of the literature written before the death of Hasan Askari sahib (11th Ithna Asheri Imam) not even a single tradition speaks about the happening of only 12 Imams from Syyedna Prophet Mohammad (s) till Qayamat.
When Hasan Askari sahib died childless, they forged a story of mysterious disappearance of his son. They contend he disappeared so mysteriously that even his mother (bond maid of Hasan Askari sahib) could not realise and thereafter no news of him ever came - WE INQUIRE: THEN FROM WHERE THIS NEWS CAME THAT HE IS STILL ALIVE?
So when Ithna Asheri's were left leaderless after the death of Hasan Askari sahib, then they forged idea to imagine there was son of Hasan Askari sahib who will remain alive till Qayamat, their Imams headcount came to 11, so they back-projected to pull down Mola Ali a.s. from Walayat (Quran verse 5:55) to lower hierarchy of Imamat, so if it becomes 12 then they can con and misguide commoner that Sunni's books have traditions quoting "12 Caliphs". Though none of these traditions are using words "12 Imam", but have count of number 12 in it!
We will discuss the 12 caliphs Sunni tradition in detail in coming days. Inshallah.
It will be good to reiterate, all traditions in context of Imam headcount being total to twelve or Prophet Mohammad (s) hadith stating names of 12 Ithna Asheri Imams - these and similar all traditions are not present in any literature written before death of Hasan Askari sahib. They all are forged after childless demise of Hasan Askari sahib.
The traditions of Twelve Caliphs
As per Encyclopaedia Britannica, "caliph" means successor.
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. said, "In the year 300, the sun would rise from the west." [Ref: Mir Khwand Tarikh i Rawdat al Safa, Tehran edition, Vol. 4, P. 181]
As'habul Kahaf (companions of cave) too remained in concealment for three hundred years. [Ref: Quran].
1-2-3, Mawiya, Yazeed, Ummaiyya and Abbasi came to caliphate and all below twelve 'maqamaat' (authority/post holder) went into concealment:
(1) Mola Ali,
(2) First Imam Hasan,
(3) Hussain,
(4) Ali,
(5) Bakir,
(6) Sadiq,
(7) Ismail,
(8) Mohammad,
(9) Abdullah
(10) Ahmed
(11) Abdullah ar-Radi Hussain
(12) Al Mahdi
Salwaat and salaam on all twelve caliphs above.
Like As'habul Kahaf aroused after 300 years of concealment so does Fatimi Imam Caliph Al Mahdi a.s. (the haqiqi Sun) rose from Maghrib (West) coming out of night of concealment and established Islamic sultanate in Hijri year 300. Forecast of Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. turned to be true.
Also there are twelve caliph (not trustable) hadith in Sunni books, however if we assume it be not incorrect then they too match with above: The twelfth caliph Fatimi Imam Al Mahdi ibn Abdullah eradicated the tyranny of the then oppressors and established Islamic sultanate. Above proves Haq Islam is with Fatimi line of Imams.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[11] Parallels of Prophet Sunnat in marriage and association of it with rightful successor
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. among his all wives loved most to Sayyeda Khadija r.a., till she was alive, he didn't marry with any other women. This establishes superiority of Khadija r.a. over all other wives of Prophet s.a.w.w. and also represent that child from her womb will succeed Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w.
¡î Mola Ali a.s. among his all wives loved most to Molatina Fatima a.s, till she was alive he didn't marry with any other women. This establish superiority of Fatima a.s. over all other wives of Ali a.s. and represent that child from her womb will succeed Mola Ali a.s.
¡î Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. among his all wives loved most to Molatina Fatima r.a., till she was alive he didn't marry with any other women. [Source: Ithna Asheri's prominent scholar - Shaharistani].
This establish superiority of Fatima (mother of Imam Ismail a.s.) over all other wives of Imam Jaffer Sadik (including that of bondmaid mother of Hazrat Musa Kazim sahab). This represents that successor of Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. will be from the womb of Sayyeda Fatima r.a. (= Imam Ismail a.s. )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[12] Osool-a-Kafi
Some claims that this book is attested by the 12th Imam, and that make them proclaim: Osool-a-Kafi is 'kati' for us (meaning this book is sufficient for us).
Bakir Majlisi, a prominent scholar of Ithna Asheri claims that majority of traditions reported in this book are 'dhaeef' (unreliable).
Should 12th Imam had attested this book then there cannot remain any unreliable traditions, all have to be reliable as they are vetted by the Imam.
So in light of Bakir Majlisi's statement, either this book is unreliable or if we assume the book is attested by the 12th Imam then inference will be that he is not reliable as he has attested unreliable traditions or else Janab Bakir Majlisi is not reliable person to make such statements about this book.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adam a.s.did nuss over Habeel a.s., Ibrahim a.s.did nuss over Ismail a.s., Musa a.s.did nuss over Haroon a.s., Eesa a.s.did nuss over Shamoon a.s., Mohammad s.a.w.w.did nuss over Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s., Ali a.s.did nuss over Imam Hussain a.s.,...
The single key difference between Ismaili's and Ithna Asheri's is on point of "nuss" - former proves nuss by Imam Sadiq a.s. was done over Imam Ismail a.s., where else latter contends that the original nuss on Ismail a.s. was replaced by nuss over Hz. Musa Kazim sahib. So nuss is the key factor in matter of succession, he will become the Imam who is bestowed with nuss.
All Ithna Asheri books are in unison that their 11th Imam Hz. Hasan Askari sahib has not done any 'nuss' over Hz. Mohammad Mahdi. [Reference: Ayatullah Sayyed Sadrullah Sadr, book name: Al-Mahdi A.S.].
Remember: Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. was told by Allah till you do not do public nuss over Ali a.s. all your efforts till date as Prophet will go wasted. And when nuss was done, Allah sent aayat, now the religion is completed. Mola Ali a.s. did public nuss over his son Imam Hasan a.s., so did Hasan over to Hussain a.s., indeed he even did in writing (reference: in agreement between Imam Hasan a.s. and Muawiya, both agreed that after latter death the caliphate will be passed to former successor Imam Hussain a.s. ibn Mola Ali a.s., during the Moharram speeches it is always recited that Imam Hussain a.s. decared nuss over Imam Ali Zainul Abideen. So 'nuss' (the official public declaration) is the must for appointing next Imam. And Hz. Hasan Askari sahib didn't do any nuss over his son.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No nuss-a-jali done by Hz. Hasan Askari sahib -
[1] Was Al Mufid 'masoom'? No. Was his work vouched by Imam Mahdi (Imam of his time)? No. Is he subject to all human errors, bias, etc? Yes. So to rely on Al Mufid as the primary source to prove "Nuss-a-Jali" by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi is in itself a weak premise.
[2] There are two types of 'Nuss': (1) Nuss a Khafi and (2) Nuss a Jali, former is secretly said and latter is publicly declared. Example) Every time Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. declared Mola Ali a.s. as his successor before the event of Gadheer-a-Khum it was 'nuss-a-Khafi' (indicative declaration of successor)however, nuss-a-khafi is insignificant as Allah told to Mohammed s.a.w.w. that should you not declare Ali's nomination publicly (nuss-a-Jali)then all work of Prophethood will go waste. Despite Prophet s.a.w.w. declaration of secret/private 'nuss' on Ali several time before Gadheer event still Allah consider all such efforts as waste until the public declaration is not made. Further, even in work of Al Mufid there is no tradition that says about 'nuss-a-Jali' by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi.
[3] Al Mufid writings are IMPLICITLY proving the Imamate of Imam Mahdi. But there is no EXPLICIT tradition that says that Imam Hasan Askari made the 'nuss-a-Jali' over Imam Mahdi.
[4] You say, "Ishaara" (indication) is given in Osool-a-Kafi, but you see Sunni too says Prophet s.a.w.w. did "ishaara" (indicated) that Hz. Abu Bakr is the next authorised person. Does all Shia's accept such (ishaara) indications? No. So 'ishara' (indications) given in Osool-a-Kafi on Imamat is not equal to the facts of having 'nuss-a-jali' done by Imam Hasan Askari to Imam Mahdi.
[5] Bakir Majlisi categorically said, that majority of traditions in 'Osool-a-Kafi' are fake/false! So traditions in reference to indications are true or false is marked with doubts.
[6] "Walayat" of Mola Ali a.s. is the single most important matter for any Shia but there is not even one chapter on Walayat in Osool-a-Kafi. So one cannot even remotely expect this book to validate the declaration of next Imam by Imam Hasan al Askari.
[7] The chain of narrators 'raawi' quoted in Osool-a-Kafi most of them have names of enemy of Shia Imams. They proudly says that unlike Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim their book of traditions Osool-a-Kafi is distinct as it quotes Shia's narrator than Sunni's. However, the Kafi was collected 200 years after the martyrdom of Imam Hussain a.s. and all the then Shia knew of the tragic event of Karbala. So any true Shia will not keep the name of their wards after the name of 1/2/3, Mawiya, Yazeed, Hurmula, Shimr, etc - but many-many of the narrator in Kafi have these names - how can they be Shia's?!!!
[8] Some regards Osool-a-Kafi is the only book on traditions to be vouched by the Imam Mahdi (a masoom) - but see the state of affairs of this book in point# 4, 5, 6 & 7 - no where does it proves the nuss-a-jali done by Imam Hasan Askri to Imam Mahdi!
[9] In event like marriage at least two male witness or four female witness are required. The matter of Imamate is much superior than matter of marriage. We assume that they have quoted the best example from Bakir Majlisi, so this best example speaks of just one witness! It may be consider as 'nuss-a-khafi' but certainly not 'nuss-a-Jali' this proves there is no tradition proving the 'nuss-a-jali' even in work of Bakir Majlisi.
[10] To conclude:There was no reliably categorical, clear and loud tradition that proves Imam Mahdi was declared next Imam by Imam Hasan Askari by means of nuss-a-jali.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[2] No threat to life so hiding for it is irrational.
They contends that their 12th Imam Mahdi is in seclusion for past 1200 years because of threat over his life.
They also claims that Imam Mahdi will be joined by Prophet Christ a.s., will kill Dajjal, will bring peace and justice everywhere, etc. So till all these events doesn't happens Imam Mahdi sahib cannot die.Hence, their original contention that he is hidden due to threat to his life is proven to be false and misleading.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[4] No claim for Imamat
None of the last five Imams of Ithna Asheri's have never ever claimed that they are rightful "Imams". Neither Hz. Hasan Askari sahib has recognized his (alleged) son to be the next Imam (no nuss done). Commoners are told one will die as non-Muslim those who didn't recognize Imam of time. See the mismatch: Hasan Askari sahib is not recognising his (alleged) son to be the next Imam of time (no nuss), but past 1200 years Ithna's are acting otherwise!
What will be the definition of "recognising" Imam? No traditions available in no books written before the demise of Hasan Askari sahib, and we doubt such info even is not written in literature after his death.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[5] Sons of bond maid
From Hazrat Musa Kazim onwards all Imams of Ithna Asheri line are sons of bond-maid (slave girls), where else all Fatimi Imams are sons of proper Muslim mother. Muslima (mother of all Fatimi Imams) cannot be bought or sold from market or from anywhere, but the bond-maids are bought / sold in marketplace to highest bidder like commodities - can such women be mother of rightful Imams, the sons of Mola Ali a.s.?!!! Never.
Book: History of Islam, by Maulana S. Ali Naqi Naqvi on page 19- Sara has asked Ibrahim to make (extramarital illicit sexual) relations with Hajar so Ibrahim can become father as Sara got too old to bear a child.
So per Ithna's theory Prophet Ismail a.s. too is son of bond maid, by the extension Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. too is the son of bond maid. If those Prophets are acceptable though being sons of bond maid then so does their Imams from Hz. Musa Kazim sahib till Hz. Hasan Askari sahib who are all sons of bond maid.
www.TheBohras.com: Above is the lie. Isaac was son of Sara. The birth of Isaac falsify everything forged above in red. They think Prophet Ibrahim a.s. is one like them to make illicit sexual relations practiced by them under cover of Muta.
The same author contradicts himself, on page 27 he writes, Bani Israil are descendent of Isaac son of Ibrahim from Sara!!!
Primarily Ithna Asheri quotes Bible old testament for their case above. It is true in Bible case above in red it mentioned, but then again the birth of Isaac from Sara proves the theory in red above as fabricated lies.
Q) Why Christians and Israelites have forged above in old testament?
A) Because both Christians and Jews are from progeny of Isaac a.s. and Prophet Mohammad PBUH is from the progeny of Hz. Ismail a.s.. As they have lost to Islam not only in all battlefields but also in 'Mubahila' so to mock Islam they have altered the text of original Bible to prove that Prophet Mohammad is actually the son from illicit illegal sexual relations!
Ithna Asheri's in their inability and failure to counter the fact that not even one but all of their Imams are the sons of bond maid, they went so far from Siraat-a-Mustaqeem that they adopted as correct the lie version of Christian and Jew Old Testament which was fabricated to mock Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w.
On page 18 & 19 of above mentioned book, author is saying, "A long period had elapsed since Ibrahim had settled in Syria. He and his wife Sara had long been married but they had no issue. Sara then earnestly advised Ibrahim to have conjugal relations with Hajra, who was already with her, so that God might bless them with children. Ibrahim acted upon her suggestion and consequently Hajra gave birth to a son, Ismail."
Hajra was not even bond maid of Ibrahim so as per Ithna's Ibrahim has raped Hajar! Making illegal relations with any women is rape. Hence Hajar is not a good women because of her the FRIEND OF ALLAH, Prophet Ibrahim a.s. has committed sin of raping women or making conjugal relations! Should this was true - then why will Allah make action of Hajar of she doing 'sahi' between Safa and Marwa hillock as the part of the pillar of Islam, Haj?!!! Hence proved, Hajar was proper Muslima, married to Ibrahim and his status was attested by Allah be making her action as part of Haj.
To justify their Imams, they have insulted and reduced the status of Prophet Ibrahim a.s. and Molatina Hajar a.s.
Ismail ibn Kathir, a highly influential Sunni scholar in his book "Qissa-a-Anbiya" writes that Haajar w/o Prophet Ibrahim (a) was daughter of some King (not the bondmaid as falsely accused by Ithna Asheri)and was marriedto Ibrahim (not having illicit relations as falsely accused by the Bible Old Testament and Ithna's).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[6]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[7] Prophet Ibrahim -anti to- Imambara housing idols
In Quran, Sura Ibrahim says: Ibrahim beheaded all smaller idols, made rosary of it and hanged it over neck of bigger idol. Worshippers on their return to temple were aghast to see the situation and accused Ibrahim for same:
Idol worshippers - Have you did that?
Ibrahim - Ask your bigger idol.
Idol worshippers - Neither he listens, nor he replies.
Ibrahim - Then you should not maintain them.
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. and Mola Ali a.s. cleared the terrace of Kaaba from all idols.
Both above case clearly establish that one should not maintain idols. But Ithna Asheri Imambada's are full of idols of horses, cradle, Imam Hussain a.s. statue, girl-frocks, aluminium/steel hands, 'taaziya' - all decorated in lights, with burning scent-sticks and flowerbeds are hanged over them!
We like to ask: When you kiss or garland the steel hand or statue of Imam Hussain a.s. or seek blessings from it - does it feel and understand your actions?!!! NO. Ask those 'Panja' or 'Shabeeh' to reply you?!!! Will they reply? NO.
Thus one is wasting his/her money by offering flowers rosary over them or by burning scent-sticks near it. Moreover, it is against the sunnat of Prophet Ibrahim a.s. as discussed above.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[8] Fatimi Imams are known by their Mothers name
Allah will call everyone by their and their mother's name on the day of judgement. None of the ruling or non-ruling religious head like Banu Abbas, Ithna Ashier Imams, Banu Umaiyya, Ottoman Empire, etc none of them are named after their mother. Only Fatimi Imam's are identified or called by their mother (Fatima) name.
The world first modern university was brain work of Fatimi Imam Syyedna Moiz a.s.was named after his mother "Al Zahra" (Al Azhar University) in Cairo.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[9] Head of Imam Hussain a.s. resting with his progeny of Fatimi Imams
Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem
History of the sacred head of 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain a.s.
Fatimi Dawat stand: Sacred head of 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s. was burried at Ashkelon and then transferred to Egypt to be burried along with Imam Hussain a.s. progeny of Fatimi Imams a.s.
All branches of Shia don't agree with above are proven incorrect by the analytical article published by a USA newspaper Los Angeles Times (USA) (article link below). Our stand is endorsed by Los Angeles Times. Subhan'Allah.
Headless body of Imam Hussain a.s. remained and burried in Karbala. His head over the spear was sent as winners trophy first in Kufa to its governor Ibn Ziyad and later to Yazeed in Damascus.
Durrenajaf says, 2nd Fatimi Imam Hussain a.s. head was then burried in niche of one of the walls of Jama Masjid in Damascus for approx. two centuries. In hatred for Imam Hussain a.s. the Banu Abbasi caliph secretly transferred head to Ashkelon (Israil), 58 kilometres from Tel Aviv in year 295 A.H.
Fatimi Imam Syyedna wa molana Imam Aziz a.s. traced the site of sacred head of Imam Hussain a.s., like Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. traced burial site of Mola Ali a.s.
Fatimi Dai Syyedi Badrul Jamali r.a. in year 448 A.H. with blessings of Imam Mustansirbillah a.s. conquered Palestine and at that site constructed mosque (which Los Angeles Times is reporting in its article).
Sunni historian Ibn Khalikan and traveller Ibn Batuta admitted the authenticity of the burial place of Raas al Hussain in Ashkelon.
Historians - (1) Maqrezi, (2) Al Qalaq'Shandi and (3) Ibn Muyassar (for their book names and page number refer to Durrenajaf article in this context) reports - on 2nd September 1153 A.D. the head of Imam Hussain a.s. was burried along with his sons graves of Fatimi Imams a.s.
At present and since past approx. one thousand years the sacred head of Imam Hussain a.s. is resting along with his sons, the Fatimi Imams a.s. in Cairo.
Salwaat.
Link to Los Angeles Times: articles.latimes.com/2008/may/21/world/fg-mosque21
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[10] "The twelve rulers" hadith
Oxford dictionary: Caliph = The chief Muslim civil and religious RULER, regarded as the successor of Mohammad (s).
The only twelve rulers in single chain that Earth has seen from the tribe of Quraysh are:
1. Mola Ali ibn Abi Talib a.s.
2. Imam Hasan ibn Ali (a)
3. Imam Abdullah Mehdi (a)
4. Imam Mohammad Quaim (a)
5. Imam Mansoor (a)
6. Imam Moiz (a)
7. Imam Aziz (a)
8. Imam Hakim (a)
9. Imam Zahir (a)
10. Imam Mustansirbillah (a)
11. Imam Mustali (a)
12. Imam Aamir (a)
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
At least 9 out of 12 Ithna Asheri Imams have never ever ruled any territories!!!
# Umayyad rulers were: 33.
# Abbasi rulers were: 54.
# Al Mohad rulers: 13.
# Ottoman caliphs (ruler): 29.
# Zaydi Imams (caliphs): 5.
In history only the chain of Fatimi Imams have the precise count of 12 rulers / emirs / caliphs.
Bihar al-Anwar, the most reputed book of Ithna Asheri's (vol. 36, chap. 41, tradition 102) says: Prophet said Islam will survive till the Qayamat AND there are 12 caliphs RULING upon you.
Twelvers own book says the 12 Imams have to be 12 rulers. But at least 9 of 12 Ithna Imams were NOT rulers. Hence, by Ithna's own standard their line of Imamat is not Islamic but of imposters. Isn't it?
This hadith is also reported by Sunni's 'Musnad Ahmad' vol. 5, pg. 89.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sahih Bukhari 89 : 329 - Prophet said, there will be 12 Muslim rulers who will lead the Islamic world.
None of the Ithna Asheri Imam never ever ruled any territory. Only 12 Fatimi Imams ruled large territories.
Sahih Muslim 20 : 4480 & 82 - Islam will triumph, remain powerful and dominant until 12 caliphs.
Only Fatimi Imams have ruled completely over Vatican / Italy, Israil and even kicked out Abbasi caliph from their capital city of Baghdad.
Where else Ithna Asheri Imams with their version of Islam never triumphed and never ever dominated anything!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sunni's Ahmad ibn Hanbal vol. 1, pg. 398 - How many caliph will rule this nation? Prophet replied, twelve like the chiefs of bani Israel.
9/12 Ithna Asheri Imams never ever ruled. Where else twelve caliphs of Fatimi line of Imams did rule.
The count of 12 precisely fit only with Fatimi Imams rulers.
Above facts establish the conclusion that the only rightful successor of Prophet Mohammad (s) is the Fatimi line of Imams.
The count of Twelve
Quran verse 5:55 categorically uses the word "Wali" in context of Mola Ali a.s. along with Mohammad (s) as the authority of Islam.
Mohammad (s) said, "Me and Ali are the father and mother of all Mumineen. Hasan and Hussain are the rightful Imam and their father Ali (the Wali) is superior than them." So Imam Hasan a.s. is the 1st Imam of era of Mohammad (s). And Ali a.s. is Wasi.
Allegiance to Allah's appointed Authorised person i.e. Nabi, wasi and Imam is of so paramount importance that Fatimi Dawat recognise 'Walayat' as the Pillar of Islam.
They unjustly pull-down status of Mola Ali a.s. from upper Islamic hierarchy of Walayat to lower hierarchy of Imamat to make their Imams headcount to twelve!
Please pay attention: In none of the literature written before the death of Hasan Askari sahib (11th Ithna Asheri Imam) not even a single tradition speaks about the happening of only 12 Imams from Syyedna Prophet Mohammad (s) till Qayamat.
When Hasan Askari sahib died childless, they forged a story of mysterious disappearance of his son. They contend he disappeared so mysteriously that even his mother (bond maid of Hasan Askari sahib) could not realise and thereafter no news of him ever came - WE INQUIRE: THEN FROM WHERE THIS NEWS CAME THAT HE IS STILL ALIVE?
So when Ithna Asheri's were left leaderless after the death of Hasan Askari sahib, then they forged idea to imagine there was son of Hasan Askari sahib who will remain alive till Qayamat, their Imams headcount came to 11, so they back-projected to pull down Mola Ali a.s. from Walayat (Quran verse 5:55) to lower hierarchy of Imamat, so if it becomes 12 then they can con and misguide commoner that Sunni's books have traditions quoting "12 Caliphs". Though none of these traditions are using words "12 Imam", but have count of number 12 in it!
We will discuss the 12 caliphs Sunni tradition in detail in coming days. Inshallah.
It will be good to reiterate, all traditions in context of Imam headcount being total to twelve or Prophet Mohammad (s) hadith stating names of 12 Ithna Asheri Imams - these and similar all traditions are not present in any literature written before death of Hasan Askari sahib. They all are forged after childless demise of Hasan Askari sahib.
The traditions of Twelve Caliphs
As per Encyclopaedia Britannica, "caliph" means successor.
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. said, "In the year 300, the sun would rise from the west." [Ref: Mir Khwand Tarikh i Rawdat al Safa, Tehran edition, Vol. 4, P. 181]
As'habul Kahaf (companions of cave) too remained in concealment for three hundred years. [Ref: Quran].
1-2-3, Mawiya, Yazeed, Ummaiyya and Abbasi came to caliphate and all below twelve 'maqamaat' (authority/post holder) went into concealment:
(1) Mola Ali,
(2) First Imam Hasan,
(3) Hussain,
(4) Ali,
(5) Bakir,
(6) Sadiq,
(7) Ismail,
(8) Mohammad,
(9) Abdullah
(10) Ahmed
(11) Abdullah ar-Radi Hussain
(12) Al Mahdi
Salwaat and salaam on all twelve caliphs above.
Like As'habul Kahaf aroused after 300 years of concealment so does Fatimi Imam Caliph Al Mahdi a.s. (the haqiqi Sun) rose from Maghrib (West) coming out of night of concealment and established Islamic sultanate in Hijri year 300. Forecast of Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. turned to be true.
Also there are twelve caliph (not trustable) hadith in Sunni books, however if we assume it be not incorrect then they too match with above: The twelfth caliph Fatimi Imam Al Mahdi ibn Abdullah eradicated the tyranny of the then oppressors and established Islamic sultanate. Above proves Haq Islam is with Fatimi line of Imams.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[11] Parallels of Prophet Sunnat in marriage and association of it with rightful successor
Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w. among his all wives loved most to Sayyeda Khadija r.a., till she was alive, he didn't marry with any other women. This establishes superiority of Khadija r.a. over all other wives of Prophet s.a.w.w. and also represent that child from her womb will succeed Prophet Mohammad s.a.w.w.
¡î Mola Ali a.s. among his all wives loved most to Molatina Fatima a.s, till she was alive he didn't marry with any other women. This establish superiority of Fatima a.s. over all other wives of Ali a.s. and represent that child from her womb will succeed Mola Ali a.s.
¡î Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. among his all wives loved most to Molatina Fatima r.a., till she was alive he didn't marry with any other women. [Source: Ithna Asheri's prominent scholar - Shaharistani].
This establish superiority of Fatima (mother of Imam Ismail a.s.) over all other wives of Imam Jaffer Sadik (including that of bondmaid mother of Hazrat Musa Kazim sahab). This represents that successor of Imam Jaffer Sadik a.s. will be from the womb of Sayyeda Fatima r.a. (= Imam Ismail a.s. )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[12] Osool-a-Kafi
Some claims that this book is attested by the 12th Imam, and that make them proclaim: Osool-a-Kafi is 'kati' for us (meaning this book is sufficient for us).
Bakir Majlisi, a prominent scholar of Ithna Asheri claims that majority of traditions reported in this book are 'dhaeef' (unreliable).
Should 12th Imam had attested this book then there cannot remain any unreliable traditions, all have to be reliable as they are vetted by the Imam.
So in light of Bakir Majlisi's statement, either this book is unreliable or if we assume the book is attested by the 12th Imam then inference will be that he is not reliable as he has attested unreliable traditions or else Janab Bakir Majlisi is not reliable person to make such statements about this book.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -